The “Defamation-Proof” Plaintiff Doctrine

The fundamental purpose of defamation law is to compensate for harm done to one’s reputation. What happens though when a plaintiff’s reputation is already so sullied that it would be impossible to inflict further harm? Such a person is referred to in libel law as a libel-proof plaintiff (also referred to by some courts as being defamation-proof or slander-proof).

The libel-proof plaintiff doctrine traces its roots back to the Second Circuit’s 1975 opinion in Cardillo v. Doubleday & Co., Inc., which involved the question of whether the plaintiff, a lifelong criminal who at the time of the lawsuit was serving 21 years in a federal penitentiary, could sustain a defamation claim concerning statements in a book entitled My Life in the Mafia accusing him of committing various crimes. The book, written by a purported mobster, contained several claims that the plaintiff participated in specific crimes. The plaintiff denied having participated in those specific crimes, though admitted to and was convicted of participating in numerous other crimes. The Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of the case because it “consider[ed] as a matter of law that appellant is, for purposes of this case, libel-proof.” Given the plaintiff’s unquestionable reputation for being a criminal, the Second Circuit reasoned that false statements accusing him of committing crimes could not further injure his reputation.

What does it mean to be libel-proof?

As we have discussed elsewhere on this website, a defamation claim requires (1) a false statement; (2) about the plaintiff; (3) that is published to a third party; and (4) that harms a plaintiff by lowering that person in the eyes of the community. If the plaintiff is a public official or public figure, an additional “actual malice” element is required to state a claim. Being libel-proof means, quite simply, that the plaintiff’s reputation is so bad that any false statement could not lower that person in the eyes of the community any further. The thought is that such a plaintiff’s claim must fail because that plaintiff has suffered no harm as a result of the false statement. Courts that have applied the doctrine often limit the finding that a plaintiff is libel-proof to a particular topic or set of topics.

The libel-proof plaintiff doctrine is itself the outgrowth of another defamation law doctrine known as the “incremental harm” doctrine. The incremental harm doctrine holds that if the defamatory statement does no more harm than the true statements about the plaintiff, then there is no actionable claim for defamation. The incremental harm doctrine has been has been discussed and embraced by the Seventh Circuit in cases such as Haynes v. Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. where the court famously wrote that “falsehoods which do no incremental damage to the plaintiff's reputation do not injure the only interest that the law of defamation protects.”

Whether you are being accused of harming someone’s reputation or you believe someone else has harmed your reputation by making defamatory statements, it is important to find an experienced slander law and cyber-smear law attorney who will be familiar with defamation claims and defenses. Our DuPage County defamation attorneys defend our client’s freedom of speech in posting on Facebook, Yelp and other websites comments critical of a company or professional or which deal with issues of public interest. You can look here to review a case where successfully raised the defense that our client’s alleged defamatory statements must be construed innocently. Here is an arbitrator’s ruling that our client’s 20 youtube video posts were not libelous. We recently forced a defendant who falsely accused our client of international diamond fraud to issue a full retraction and apology or face a $16 million libel suit.

Our Cook County defamation attorneys also bring claims on behalf of businesses, attorneys, dentists, doctors and other professionals throughout the Northern Illinois area including in Wilmette and Evanston. We do this when that face false online reviews. We have successfully represented companies who are victims of false review sites and fake consumer posts. In addition to slander and libel law, our Chicago business, commercial, class-action, and consumer litigation lawyers represent closely held family business owners, shareholders, LLC members and companies of all sizes in many types of lawsuits between businesses. In each lawsuit or disputed matter, we seek to resolve the case efficiently to insure that our business clients’ investments are protected and they can return to profitable enterprises. You can contact us online here or telephone us on our toll-free number at 630-333-0333.

Client Reviews
"I was referred to Peter Lubin from someone in the car business to handle a law suit. From the moment I made the appointment Peter and his staff were outstanding. This wasn't an easy case, most lawyers had turned me down. However, Peter took the time to meet with me and review everything. He took on the case, and constantly communicated with me about updates and case information. We beat this non-compete agreement case in record time. I would use him again and recommend him to my closest family and friends. 5 stars is not enough to thank him for his service." Sebastian R.
"I worked on two occasions with Peter Lubin and his staff. They took their time with me and discussed each and every item in detail. The group makes you feel like you are part of the family and not just another hourly charge. I recommend Peter to anyone who asks me for a referral. If you are looking for a top notch attorney at a reasonable rate, look no further than Lubin Austermuehle." Kurt A.
"Excellent law firm. My case was a complicated arbitration dispute from another state. Was handled with utmost professionalism and decency. Mr. Peter Lubin was able to successfully resolve the case on my behalf and got me a very favorable settlement. Would recommend to anyone looking for a serious law firm. Great staff and great lawyers!" Albey L.
"I have known Peter Lubin for over 30 years. He has represented me on occasion with sound legal advice. He is a shrewd and tough negotiator leading to positive outcomes and averting prolonged legal hassles in court. He comes from a family with a legal pedigree and deep roots in Chicago's top legal community. You want him on your case. You need him on your opponents case. He won't stop fighting until he wins." Christopher G.
"Peter and his team helped us with an auto fraud case. They communicated well (timely and very responsive), investigated deeply, and negotiated a very good settlement. We were able to resolve our significant issue without a large burden and in a manner that allowed for us to come out ahead. I'd recommend Peter and his team strongly!" R.J. Callahan
"Peter was really nice and helpful when I came to him with an initial question about a non-compete. Would definitely reach out again, recommended to everyone." Johannes B.