Limited by Industry

One factor that courts consider when determining if a restrictive covenant is enforceable is the whether the restriction is limited to the employer’s industry. While courts permit an employer to protect its business interests, an individual must have options for employment outside of his former employer. Courts will generally find non-compete agreements that are not limited to a specific industry unreasonable and unenforceable. For example, take an employee who leaves a tech company to work for a publishing company. There would be little, if any, need to restrict the former employee’s ability to work in this industry. The tech company’s trade secrets are of little value to a publishing company and a tech company rarely, if ever, competes for the same customers as a publishing company. Our Chicago restrictive covenant enforceability lawyers understand that a non-compete agreement that would seek to prohibit the former employee from working in this unrelated industry would likely be found unenforceable. Requiring restrictive covenants to be limited by industry significantly widens the employee's prospects to find work after her employment with her former employer has been terminated.

It is important to note that a limitation by industry can be even further restricted to only a subset of the employer’s industry. A real life example of this involved a non-compete agreement included in a college football coach’s contract. The covenant not to compete prohibited the coach only from coaching another football team in the same conference. Under this agreement, the coach could leave the school and still coach college football provided that his next school was not in the same conference.

A non-compete agreement that is narrowly tailored by industry (or a subset of an industry) benefits both employers and employees. Properly limiting the application of the non-compete agreement to the employer’s industry (or subset thereof) safely avoids the possibility of imposing undue hardship on the employee by providing enough opportunities for other employment after leaving the employer. It also protects the legitimate business interests of the employer and raises the likelihood that its restrictive covenant will be found enforceable.

Whether or not a covenant not to compete that prohibits an employee from working in the same industry is enforceable relies in large part on the industry in which the employee works. The broader the industry and the more subsets contained therein, the more likely a restrictive covenant will have to be narrowly tailored to be enforceable. The restrictive covenant enforceability attorneys at our Chicago firm can advise you on how to narrowly tailor a covenant not to compete.

Employers and employees often fail to scrutinize their own restrictive covenants under the same microscopes courts will. This results in employers attempting to enforce overly broad restrictive covenants and employees feeling unduly burdened complying with such restrictive covenants. That is why having a highly experienced attorney to review restrictive covenants is crucial.

The Chicago restrictive covenant enforceability attorneys at Lubin Austermuehle, P.C. have decades of experience negotiating employee contracts and non-compete agreements. It is always good policy to have a knowledgeable attorney review the contract for fairness before signing it. It is equally important to have a knowledgeable attorney advise you regarding the enforceability of the restrictive covenants after the employment has ended. If you have questions about a non-compete agreement or other restrictive covenant, please contact us online or call us at 630-333-0333 for an appointment with a restrictive covenant enforceability lawyer in Chicago.

Client Reviews
"I was referred to Peter Lubin from someone in the car business to handle a law suit. From the moment I made the appointment Peter and his staff were outstanding. This wasn't an easy case, most lawyers had turned me down. However, Peter took the time to meet with me and review everything. He took on the case, and constantly communicated with me about updates and case information. We beat this non-compete agreement case in record time. I would use him again and recommend him to my closest family and friends. 5 stars is not enough to thank him for his service." Sebastian R.
"I worked on two occasions with Peter Lubin and his staff. They took their time with me and discussed each and every item in detail. The group makes you feel like you are part of the family and not just another hourly charge. I recommend Peter to anyone who asks me for a referral. If you are looking for a top notch attorney at a reasonable rate, look no further than Lubin Austermuehle." Kurt A.
"Excellent law firm. My case was a complicated arbitration dispute from another state. Was handled with utmost professionalism and decency. Mr. Peter Lubin was able to successfully resolve the case on my behalf and got me a very favorable settlement. Would recommend to anyone looking for a serious law firm. Great staff and great lawyers!" Albey L.
"I have known Peter Lubin for over 30 years. He has represented me on occasion with sound legal advice. He is a shrewd and tough negotiator leading to positive outcomes and averting prolonged legal hassles in court. He comes from a family with a legal pedigree and deep roots in Chicago's top legal community. You want him on your case. You need him on your opponents case. He won't stop fighting until he wins." Christopher G.
"Peter and his team helped us with an auto fraud case. They communicated well (timely and very responsive), investigated deeply, and negotiated a very good settlement. We were able to resolve our significant issue without a large burden and in a manner that allowed for us to come out ahead. I'd recommend Peter and his team strongly!" R.J. Callahan
"Peter was really nice and helpful when I came to him with an initial question about a non-compete. Would definitely reach out again, recommended to everyone." Johannes B.