Geographic Limitation

Non-compete agreements frequently include a geographical limitation, but a restrictive covenant without a geographic limitation will almost never be enforceable. Some non-compete agreements will define the geographic limitation by a radius around the company's headquarters. Others may limit the non-compete agreement to specific cities or states in which the employer does business. Whether or not the geographic limitation is reasonable depends largely on facts unique to each employer such as the goods or services provided, the size of the business, the amount of business the employer does in the restricted area, and the type and number of customers located within the restricted area. Our Chicago non-compete agreement negotiation lawyers can help craft an agreement with a geographic limitation that is likely to be reasonable.

These unique facts will be taken into consideration when a court decides if the geographic restriction is reasonable or not. For example, in Reliable Fire Equipment Company v. Arredondo, 2011 IL 111871, the non-compete agreement at issue prohibited employees from working for a competitor anywhere in Illinois, Indiana, or Wisconsin. The lower courts had determined that the geographic limitation was not reasonable. The Illinois Supreme Court, however, overruled them finding that the large geographic limitation was reasonable to protect the employer’s legitimate business interests. In its decision, the Illinois Supreme Court noted that, the question of whether the restrictive covenant would ultimately be enforceable would have to be made considering the “totality of circumstances” of which the geographic limitation was only one factor.

In the case of Callahan v. L.G. Balfour, 534 N.E.2d 565 (Ill.App. 1989), however, an Illinois appellate court found that a geographic limitation of Chicago and seven surrounding counties in a covenant not to compete was too large to be reasonable. In making this determination, the court stressed that such a restriction imposed an undue hardship on the employee who had thirty years in the industry and would have to relocate to comply with, non-compete agreement. These two cases demonstrate that even courts within the same state can come to different conclusions regarding the reasonableness of a geographic limitation in a non-compete agreement. Our non-compete agreement negotiation attorneys can assist Chicago clients with navigating this complicated area of the law.

Each state has its own standards regarding what a reasonable geographic limitation is and there may even be different standards within different courts in the same state. For this reason, it is crucial to have an attorney familiar with the standards of your local court review any restrictive covenants before you enter them. It is equally important to have an attorney familiar with the standards of the court that will determine the enforceability of a restrictive covenant.

That’s where the Chicago non-compete agreement negotiation attorneys at Lubin Austermuehle, P.C. can help. Our attorneys have decades of experience negotiating and litigating non-compete agreements and other restrictive covenants. Conveniently located in Chicago and Oak Brook, IL, we have a wealth of knowledge regarding the various standards applied by the courts in DuPage, Cook, and the surrounding counties and the constant changes to those standards. Whether you are looking to negotiate a non-compete agreement or are being accused of violating one, a skilled non-compete agreement negotiation lawyer in the Chicago area is needed. You can contact us online today or call us at 833-306-4933.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
"I was referred to Peter Lubin from someone in the car business to handle a law suit. From the moment I made the appointment Peter and his staff were outstanding. This wasn't an easy case, most lawyers had turned me down. However, Peter took the time to meet with me and review everything. He took on the case, and constantly communicated with me about updates and case information. We beat this non-compete agreement case in record time. I would use him again and recommend him to my closest family and friends. 5 stars is not enough to thank him for his service." Sebastian R.
★★★★★
"I worked on two occasions with Peter Lubin and his staff. They took their time with me and discussed each and every item in detail. The group makes you feel like you are part of the family and not just another hourly charge. I recommend Peter to anyone who asks me for a referral. If you are looking for a top notch attorney at a reasonable rate, look no further than Lubin Austermuehle." Kurt A.
★★★★★
"Excellent law firm. My case was a complicated arbitration dispute from another state. Was handled with utmost professionalism and decency. Mr. Peter Lubin was able to successfully resolve the case on my behalf and got me a very favorable settlement. Would recommend to anyone looking for a serious law firm. Great staff and great lawyers!" Albey L.
★★★★★
"I have known Peter Lubin for over 30 years. He has represented me on occasion with sound legal advice. He is a shrewd and tough negotiator leading to positive outcomes and averting prolonged legal hassles in court. He comes from a family with a legal pedigree and deep roots in Chicago's top legal community. You want him on your case. You need him on your opponents case. He won't stop fighting until he wins." Christopher G.
★★★★★
"Peter and his team helped us with an auto fraud case. They communicated well (timely and very responsive), investigated deeply, and negotiated a very good settlement. We were able to resolve our significant issue without a large burden and in a manner that allowed for us to come out ahead. I'd recommend Peter and his team strongly!" R.J. Callahan