Fiduciary Duties

Directors in a corporation and partners in a business have what are called fiduciary duties to each other and to their companies. These primarily consist of the duty of care and the duty of loyalty. A Chicago commercial litigation attorney can advise you if you believe that one of these duties may have been breached.

Corporations

As part of the duty of care, corporate directors are required to discharge their duties: (1) in good faith, (2) with the care that an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances, and (3) in a manner the director reasonably believes to be in the best interests of the corporation. This includes a duty not to waste corporate assets by overpaying for property or services.

Directors who meet this standard generally will not be liable for decisions that later result in negative consequences to the company. At common law, this was known as the “business judgment” rule.

A director also owes a duty of loyalty to the corporation and is not allowed to profit at its expense. He or she may not have a personal interest in a financial transaction that gives rise to a conflict of interest with the corporation, nor engage in a business that directly competes with the company.

Directors’ duty of loyalty also prohibits them from taking personal advantage of a business opportunity in which their company has an interest without first giving the company an opportunity to act. As the commercial litigation lawyers at our Chicago firm understand, this is sometimes known as a “usurpation of a corporate opportunity.”

The directors also have a duty to disclose material corporate information to other members of the board.

Partnerships

The fiduciary duties of partners in a general partnership are slightly different from those of corporate officers. Under the Revised Uniform Partnership Act, a partner’s duty of loyalty is threefold: (1) to account for profits, property, opportunities, or other benefits derived by the partner; (2) to refrain from dealing with the partnership as or on behalf of a party having an adverse interest to the partnership; and (3) to refrain from competing with the partnership. Our commercial litigation attorneys can guide Chicago clients in investigating whether a partner may have violated this duty.

A partner’s duty of care to the partnership and the other partners is limited to refraining from engaging in grossly negligent or reckless conduct, intentional misconduct, or knowing violation of the law.

A partner must also provide complete and accurate information concerning the partnership.

Duty of Obedience

A third duty of partners under R.U.P.A. is known as the duty of obedience. A partner is considered an agent of the partnership and has a duty to obey all reasonable directions of the partnership. A partner must refrain from acting outside the scope of his or her actual authority (for example, making purchases the partner was instructed not to make). A partner is liable to the partnership for breaches of the duty to obey. Our Chicago commercial litigation lawyers can help you bring or defend against a claim on this basis.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
"I was referred to Peter Lubin from someone in the car business to handle a law suit. From the moment I made the appointment Peter and his staff were outstanding. This wasn't an easy case, most lawyers had turned me down. However, Peter took the time to meet with me and review everything. He took on the case, and constantly communicated with me about updates and case information. We beat this non-compete agreement case in record time. I would use him again and recommend him to my closest family and friends. 5 stars is not enough to thank him for his service." Sebastian R.
★★★★★
"I worked on two occasions with Peter Lubin and his staff. They took their time with me and discussed each and every item in detail. The group makes you feel like you are part of the family and not just another hourly charge. I recommend Peter to anyone who asks me for a referral. If you are looking for a top notch attorney at a reasonable rate, look no further than Lubin Austermuehle." Kurt A.
★★★★★
"Excellent law firm. My case was a complicated arbitration dispute from another state. Was handled with utmost professionalism and decency. Mr. Peter Lubin was able to successfully resolve the case on my behalf and got me a very favorable settlement. Would recommend to anyone looking for a serious law firm. Great staff and great lawyers!" Albey L.
★★★★★
"I have known Peter Lubin for over 30 years. He has represented me on occasion with sound legal advice. He is a shrewd and tough negotiator leading to positive outcomes and averting prolonged legal hassles in court. He comes from a family with a legal pedigree and deep roots in Chicago's top legal community. You want him on your case. You need him on your opponents case. He won't stop fighting until he wins." Christopher G.
★★★★★
"Peter and his team helped us with an auto fraud case. They communicated well (timely and very responsive), investigated deeply, and negotiated a very good settlement. We were able to resolve our significant issue without a large burden and in a manner that allowed for us to come out ahead. I'd recommend Peter and his team strongly!" R.J. Callahan
★★★★★
"Peter was really nice and helpful when I came to him with an initial question about a non-compete. Would definitely reach out again, recommended to everyone." Johannes B.