Preliminary Injunctions and Temporary Restraining Orders

The court system seems to move slowly for anyone involved in litigation. If your business is under threat, however, this slow pace can put your business and your livelihood at serious risk. For example, if someone is trying to steal your client list, you cannot wait through traditional court scheduling procedures and backlogs to get a hearing. Lubin Austermuehle, P.C.'s business and commercial litigation attorneys help clients dealing with time-sensitive matters by seeking temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions on their behalf. These court orders stop an opposing party from taking one or more actions, or require that party to perform certain actions. They are critical tools in handling an emergency legal matter. Courts call them “extraordinary relief,” and tend to reserve them for extraordinary situations. Our Chicago temporary restraining order lawyers can help you pursue these actions when appropriate.

Legal Emergencies

Certain situations require a quick and decisive response, which our regular litigation system is not always able to provide. Temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions are appropriate when a threatened action would cause imminent and irreparable harm that a money judgment could not fix. They are often the “make or break” moment in emergency litigation, because they can determine whether or not the business will suffer irreparable harm. Circumstances that may merit extraordinary relief include:

  • Trademark or copyright infringement;
  • Trademark dilution;
  • Enforcement of a non-compete or non-solicitation agreement in the face of evidence of an imminent breach;
  • Enforcement of a non-disclosure agreement, particularly as it relates to trade secrets or sensitive client or customer information;
  • Disagreements among partners, shareholders, or members regarding asset transfers;
  • Business disputes arising from a divorce or probate matter; and
  • Any case that threatens damage to a business' reputation or customer goodwill, such as product disparagement or trade libel.
Temporary Restraining Order

A temporary restraining order, or TRO, is usually the first step in emergency litigation. A request for a TRO may be part of the initial pleadings in a lawsuit, and our temporary restraining order attorneys can guide Chicago clients through this process. A plaintiff may, in certain circumstances, request a TRO without notice to the opposing party, such as when the other party might hide assets or destroy evidence in response to the TRO application. A court will grant a TRO if it believes it is necessary to prevent immediate harm. Its relief is limited, however, as a TRO only lasts for ten days or until the court can hear a motion for a preliminary injunction, which requires notice to the other side and a hearing.

Preliminary Injunction

While a preliminary injunction may restrict the same behavior as a TRO, it remains in force until revoked by the court. The court has a higher standard for granting a preliminary injunction than a TRO. It requires proof that the actions covered by the proposed injunction threaten the applicant with irreparable harm, that this harm is greater than any harm caused to the other side by the injunction, and that the applicant is likely to prevail on the merits of the lawsuit.

With offices in Chicago and Oakbrook Terrace, Illinois, Lubin Austermuehle, P.C.'s Chicago temporary restraining order attorneys represent clients in the greater Chicago area, DuPage County, elsewhere in Illinois, and in Indiana and Wisconsin. We have more than two and a half decades of collective experience in Illinois business law, and frequently handle business emergencies for our clients. Contact us via email, at 630-333-0333 to schedule a consultation with a temporary restraining order lawyer in Chicago.

Chicago Business Litigation Lawyer Blog - Preliminary Injunctions
Client Reviews
"I was referred to Peter Lubin from someone in the car business to handle a law suit. From the moment I made the appointment Peter and his staff were outstanding. This wasn't an easy case, most lawyers had turned me down. However, Peter took the time to meet with me and review everything. He took on the case, and constantly communicated with me about updates and case information. We beat this non-compete agreement case in record time. I would use him again and recommend him to my closest family and friends. 5 stars is not enough to thank him for his service." Sebastian R.
"I worked on two occasions with Peter Lubin and his staff. They took their time with me and discussed each and every item in detail. The group makes you feel like you are part of the family and not just another hourly charge. I recommend Peter to anyone who asks me for a referral. If you are looking for a top notch attorney at a reasonable rate, look no further than Lubin Austermuehle." Kurt A.
"Excellent law firm. My case was a complicated arbitration dispute from another state. Was handled with utmost professionalism and decency. Mr. Peter Lubin was able to successfully resolve the case on my behalf and got me a very favorable settlement. Would recommend to anyone looking for a serious law firm. Great staff and great lawyers!" Albey L.
"I have known Peter Lubin for over 30 years. He has represented me on occasion with sound legal advice. He is a shrewd and tough negotiator leading to positive outcomes and averting prolonged legal hassles in court. He comes from a family with a legal pedigree and deep roots in Chicago's top legal community. You want him on your case. You need him on your opponents case. He won't stop fighting until he wins." Christopher G.
"Peter and his team helped us with an auto fraud case. They communicated well (timely and very responsive), investigated deeply, and negotiated a very good settlement. We were able to resolve our significant issue without a large burden and in a manner that allowed for us to come out ahead. I'd recommend Peter and his team strongly!" R.J. Callahan
"Peter was really nice and helpful when I came to him with an initial question about a non-compete. Would definitely reach out again, recommended to everyone." Johannes B.