Franchise Litigation

The sale of a franchise allows a business, known as a franchisee, to acquire an existing business model and brand, along with the goodwill associated with that brand. Another business, known as a franchisor, sells the right to use one or more trade names and to operate a business under certain parameters, usually in exchange for a cash payment, an ongoing fee, and a share of revenue. This bundle of rights and obligations is known as a “franchise.” It gives the franchisor the opportunity to benefit further from the brand and its goodwill without having to start or operate additional business locations. 

A franchise agreement places a wide range of obligations on a franchisee, who is taking on the responsibility of managing and maintaining the franchisor’s reputation. Franchisors are obligated by law to make certain disclosures to prospective franchisees. Our Chicago franchise litigation lawyers represent both franchisors and franchisees in business and commercial litigation, assisting businesses in asserting claims for breaches of franchise agreements and other disputes, as well as negotiating, mediating, and litigating such claims.

Franchise Disclosure Document

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regulates sales of franchises by requiring franchisors to disclose various information regarding the franchisor itself and the details of the franchise to any prospective buyer. The disclosure document required by the FTC is called the Franchise Disclosure Document (FDD). It was previously known as the Uniform Franchise Offering Circular (UFOC), but the FTC changed this recently when it modified its rules. Individual states may also require their own disclosure document, and some states require franchisors to file franchise offering circulars in the state’s public records. Information required to be disclosed in the FDD includes:

  • The franchisor’s business or trade name;
  • Trademarks or other intellectual property that identify the franchised goods or services;
  • Length of time the franchisor has been in business;
  • Prior offerings and sales of the franchise;
  • Recent fraud-related judgments or settlements; and
  • Detailed statement of payments and other compensation expected from the franchisee.
Franchise Disputes

Many disputes between franchisees and franchisors involve allegations that the franchisor failed to disclose information required by FTC regulations. Other common disputes involve failure to pay required fees pursuant to the franchise agreement, misuse of intellectual property, and various breach of contract claims. Our franchise litigation attorneys can help Chicago clients navigate these issues.

Franchise Litigation

Disputes between franchisors and franchisees that may develop into litigation may include:

  • Infringement or misuse of trademark or copyright;
  • Failure to register franchise offerings;
  • Breach of a franchise agreement;
  • Fraud in the offering of a franchise;
  • Fraud in the purchase of a franchise;
  • Failure to disclose information as required by state or federal law;
  • Other breach of contract; and
  • Consumer fraud claims.

In situations where a franchisor sells franchises to a large number of franchisees, with similar defects or failures to disclose, franchisees may be able to bring a class action suit for franchise claims.

Lubin Austermuehle, P.C.’s Chicago franchise litigation attorneys have offices in Elmhurst and Chicago, Illinois. We represent clients throughout Illinois, including the Chicago metro area and DuPage County, as well as Indiana and Wisconsin. To schedule a consultation with a franchise litigation lawyer in Chicago, contact us via email, at 630-333-0333.

Chicago Business Litigation Lawyer Blog - Franchise Litigation
Client Reviews
"I was referred to Peter Lubin from someone in the car business to handle a law suit. From the moment I made the appointment Peter and his staff were outstanding. This wasn't an easy case, most lawyers had turned me down. However, Peter took the time to meet with me and review everything. He took on the case, and constantly communicated with me about updates and case information. We beat this non-compete agreement case in record time. I would use him again and recommend him to my closest family and friends. 5 stars is not enough to thank him for his service." Sebastian R.
"I worked on two occasions with Peter Lubin and his staff. They took their time with me and discussed each and every item in detail. The group makes you feel like you are part of the family and not just another hourly charge. I recommend Peter to anyone who asks me for a referral. If you are looking for a top notch attorney at a reasonable rate, look no further than Lubin Austermuehle." Kurt A.
"Excellent law firm. My case was a complicated arbitration dispute from another state. Was handled with utmost professionalism and decency. Mr. Peter Lubin was able to successfully resolve the case on my behalf and got me a very favorable settlement. Would recommend to anyone looking for a serious law firm. Great staff and great lawyers!" Albey L.
"I have known Peter Lubin for over 30 years. He has represented me on occasion with sound legal advice. He is a shrewd and tough negotiator leading to positive outcomes and averting prolonged legal hassles in court. He comes from a family with a legal pedigree and deep roots in Chicago's top legal community. You want him on your case. You need him on your opponents case. He won't stop fighting until he wins." Christopher G.
"Peter and his team helped us with an auto fraud case. They communicated well (timely and very responsive), investigated deeply, and negotiated a very good settlement. We were able to resolve our significant issue without a large burden and in a manner that allowed for us to come out ahead. I'd recommend Peter and his team strongly!" R.J. Callahan
"Peter was really nice and helpful when I came to him with an initial question about a non-compete. Would definitely reach out again, recommended to everyone." Johannes B.