Breach of Contract Enforceability and Defenses

When entering into an agreement, people often require the contract to be in writing before they agree to anything, so that they can have proof in the event that the other party fails to fulfill their end of the bargain. While putting a contract in writing does not guarantee that the contract is enforceable, it usually helps. The Statute of Frauds, as adopted by most states, requires certain types of agreements, including contracts for the sale of goods and land, to be in writing in order for the contract to be legally enforceable. 

A breach of contract is where one party fails to fulfill his or her contractual promise or obligation. However, if a contract is not properly drafted, it could be held unenforceable, and a breaching party would not be liable to the other party even if he or she fails to fulfill their obligation. In order to prevent this from happening, our Chicago breach of contract lawyers advise our clients to make sure that they write a contract which

  1. Contains an agreement and is written in such a manner that it can be clearly understood - if a party claims that there was a misunderstanding which resulted in the breach of contract, and the court agrees that the contract is not clear, then the court will not hold the party who breached the contract liable for the breach;
  2. Contains mutual obligation - each party must bear some responsibility to the other. For example, in an agreement to sell a car, one party bears the obligation of providing the car, while the other party bears the obligation of providing the amount of money which was agreed upon for the vehicle;
  3. Legality - In order to be legally binding, a contract cannot require either party to do something illegal. Any contract involving prostitution or the selling of illegal drugs, for example, would not be enforceable in a court of law.

Once the enforceability of the contract is determined, there are still instances in which a party cannot be held responsible for breach of contract. Firstly, the party that did not breach the contract must have maintained some sort of material damage as a result of the breach of contract. In that case, the party that suffered material damages can sue the other party to recover those material damages, in addition to the costs of bringing the lawsuit. Our breach of contract attorneys can assist Chicago clients with bringing these claims.

There are also degrees to which a contract can be breached. If a party performed most of their obligations under the contract, with some minor flaws or omissions, this is known as substantial performance. If a court determines that a party substantially performed their obligation as required by the contract, and the breach only involves minor deviations from the agreement, then the court would not hold the party liable for breach of contract.

In the event that all parties agree that a contract was substantially breached, there are defenses which can be used by the party that breached the contract to avoid liability. These defenses include:

  • Lack of Capacity: Certain people, such as minors and the mentally ill, lack the capacity to enter into a legal contract. This means that, if someone were to sue a teenager for failing to fulfill her obligation under a contract, the teenager would be able to escape liability by using the argument that she lacked the capacity to sign the contract in the first place, due to her status as a minor.
  • Fraud: If one party of a contract uses false statements or threats to coerce the other party into entering into the contract, then the contract would not be considered enforceable under the law.
  • The contract is unconscionable: A contract which is grossly unfair to one party is considered unconscionable. This happens when one party has much more bargaining power than the other and uses that power to force unfair conditions, clauses, or waivers onto the other party.
  • Estoppel: This is when one party makes a statement which excuses the performance of the agreement, and the other party relies on that statement. For example, a bank telling a homeowner that they will not foreclose for six months in order to give the owner a chance to sell her home. The bank cannot then sue the homeowner in that given time for breach of contract since she relied upon their promise not to foreclose.

Lubin Austermuehle, P.C.’s Chicago breach of contract attorneys have decades of experience litigating commercial litigation breach of contract disputes. With offices conveniently located in Oak Brook and Chicago, Illinois, we represent businesses and business owners all over DuPage, Cook, Lake, and Kane counties as well as in Indiana, Iowa, and Wisconsin. To consult with a breach of contract lawyer in the Chicago area today, you can contact us online or give us a call at 630-333-0333.

Client Reviews
"I was referred to Peter Lubin from someone in the car business to handle a law suit. From the moment I made the appointment Peter and his staff were outstanding. This wasn't an easy case, most lawyers had turned me down. However, Peter took the time to meet with me and review everything. He took on the case, and constantly communicated with me about updates and case information. We beat this non-compete agreement case in record time. I would use him again and recommend him to my closest family and friends. 5 stars is not enough to thank him for his service." Sebastian R.
"I worked on two occasions with Peter Lubin and his staff. They took their time with me and discussed each and every item in detail. The group makes you feel like you are part of the family and not just another hourly charge. I recommend Peter to anyone who asks me for a referral. If you are looking for a top notch attorney at a reasonable rate, look no further than Lubin Austermuehle." Kurt A.
"Excellent law firm. My case was a complicated arbitration dispute from another state. Was handled with utmost professionalism and decency. Mr. Peter Lubin was able to successfully resolve the case on my behalf and got me a very favorable settlement. Would recommend to anyone looking for a serious law firm. Great staff and great lawyers!" Albey L.
"I have known Peter Lubin for over 30 years. He has represented me on occasion with sound legal advice. He is a shrewd and tough negotiator leading to positive outcomes and averting prolonged legal hassles in court. He comes from a family with a legal pedigree and deep roots in Chicago's top legal community. You want him on your case. You need him on your opponents case. He won't stop fighting until he wins." Christopher G.
"Peter and his team helped us with an auto fraud case. They communicated well (timely and very responsive), investigated deeply, and negotiated a very good settlement. We were able to resolve our significant issue without a large burden and in a manner that allowed for us to come out ahead. I'd recommend Peter and his team strongly!" R.J. Callahan
"Peter was really nice and helpful when I came to him with an initial question about a non-compete. Would definitely reach out again, recommended to everyone." Johannes B.